What Happens at the First Hearing in a High Criminal Court in Antalya, Turkey?

Criminal Law · Antalya, Turkey
What Happens at the First Hearing in a High Criminal Court in Antalya, Turkey?

The first hearing before a Turkish High Criminal Court is the first courtroom stage at which the charge, the defendant’s procedural rights, the defence and the existing evidence are addressed within the prosecution. For a foreign defendant in Antalya, the hearing may also involve interpreter assistance, detention review and important decisions about evidence, witnesses and the next stage of the case. Preparation should therefore begin with the indictment and case file, not on the morning of the hearing.

Last updated: 5 September 2026 Legal review: Attorney Cennet Kesici Çetinbaş Core legislation: Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271
Quick Answer

At the first hearing, the court generally confirms who is present, establishes the defendant’s identity and personal circumstances, explains the acts, evidence and legal characterisation underlying the accusation, informs the defendant of procedural rights and proceeds to questioning if the defendant is ready to make a statement. Witnesses or evidence may also be addressed, and if the defendant is detained the court must reconsider whether detention should continue.

Core Provision CMK Article 191 Regulates the formal opening of the criminal hearing and the beginning of the defendant’s questioning.

What Happens Before the First High Criminal Court Hearing?

By the time a case reaches its first hearing, the investigation stage has already resulted in an indictment that has been accepted by the competent criminal court.

This means that the first hearing should not be approached as the first moment to discover what the prosecution alleges.

Before the hearing, the defence review should normally identify:

The exact criminal offence and statutory provisions relied upon.
The conduct alleged in the indictment.
Physical, documentary, digital and forensic evidence in the file.
Statements previously given to police or the prosecutor.
Witness or co-defendant statements.
The defendant’s detention or judicial-control status.
Evidence that may support the defence or require collection.

For the broader court structure and jurisdiction rules, see High Criminal Court in Turkey: Cases, Jurisdiction and Criminal Trial Process .

How Does the First Criminal Hearing Start?

Article 191 of the Criminal Procedure Code regulates the beginning of the hearing.

Beginning of the Hearing Criminal Procedure Code · Article 191

The court first determines whether the defendant and defence counsel are present and whether summoned witnesses and experts have attended. The court then announces that the hearing has begun and proceeds through the statutory opening stages.

The defendant’s identity is established and information concerning personal and economic circumstances may be obtained.

For a foreign defendant, this may include passport or other identity information in addition to ordinary personal details.

Is the Entire Indictment Read Word for Word at the First Hearing?

The essential legal requirement is not that every page of the indictment be mechanically read aloud.

Under the current wording of Article 191, the defendant must be informed of:

CONDUCT The acts forming the basis of the accusation

The defendant should understand what conduct is alleged.

EVIDENCE The evidence underlying the charge

The evidentiary basis relied upon in the indictment must be understood.

LEGAL CHARACTERISATION The alleged criminal offence

The legal classification attributed to the alleged conduct must be explained.

DEFENCE The opportunity to respond

The defendant must be able to understand the accusation before making an effective defence.

Understanding the accusation is particularly important for foreign defendants Criminal-law terminology may have a specific legal meaning that is not obvious from a literal translation of the Turkish words.

What Rights Does the Defendant Have at the First Hearing?

Article 191 expressly refers to the rights listed in Article 147 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Depending on the procedural situation, important defence rights include:

The right to understand the accusation.
The right to legal assistance from defence counsel.
The right not to make a statement concerning the alleged offence.
The right to request the collection of evidence relevant to the defence.
The right to raise factual and legal matters in the defendant’s favour.

These rights should be understood before the defendant begins answering substantive questions about the alleged offence.

How Is the Defendant Questioned at the First Hearing?

After the accusation and rights have been explained, the court may proceed to the defendant’s questioning if the defendant is ready to make a statement.

The court may ask about:

EVENTS The alleged incident

What happened, when it occurred and the defendant’s alleged role may be addressed.

OTHER PERSONS Relationships and co-defendants

Questions may concern other persons mentioned in the indictment or evidence.

PREVIOUS STATEMENTS Police or prosecutor statements

Earlier statements may become relevant, particularly where the trial defence differs materially.

EVIDENCE Specific evidentiary allegations

The defendant may be asked to respond to documents, messages, recordings or other evidence.

The objective should not be to produce the longest possible explanation. The defence should be coherent, legally relevant and consistent with the evidence and procedural strategy.

Can the Defendant Remain Silent at the First Hearing?

Yes. The defendant has the right not to make a statement concerning the alleged offence.

That does not mean there is one universal strategy for every criminal case.

The existence of a right and the strategic use of that right are separate questions A file may contain evidence that should be challenged immediately, evidence supporting the defence or inconsistencies requiring explanation. The appropriate approach depends on the individual case.

A defendant should therefore avoid deciding in advance that they must either “explain everything” or “say nothing” without first understanding the indictment and evidence.

Is Evidence Examined at the First Hearing?

Evidence may be introduced, discussed or challenged at the first hearing, although complex files often require further hearings before the evidentiary process is complete.

Evidence in a serious criminal case may include:

CCTV or other video recordings.
Mobile-phone and digital-device material.
Communication and traffic records.
Bank and financial records.
Forensic or expert reports.
Documents and official records.
Witness and co-defendant statements.
Evidence at Trial Criminal Procedure Code · Article 217

The judgment must be based on evidence brought before the hearing and discussed before the court, and the alleged offence may be proved through legally obtained evidence.

The defence analysis should therefore ask both what the evidence appears to show and whether it was obtained and introduced lawfully.

Are Witnesses Heard at the First High Criminal Court Hearing?

They can be, but not every case reaches witness examination at the first hearing.

Whether a witness is heard may depend on whether the witness has been summoned, attended the hearing and whether the court considers the testimony ready and relevant at that stage.

Where testimony is given, the defence should consider:

DIRECT KNOWLEDGE What did the witness personally observe?

First-hand observation should be distinguished from information obtained from others.

CONSISTENCY Does the statement remain consistent?

Earlier statements, dates, locations and descriptions may need comparison.

OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE Does other evidence support the account?

CCTV, documents, phone records or forensic findings may confirm or contradict testimony.

RELEVANCE What fact does the testimony actually prove?

The legal significance of the testimony matters as much as its length.

Can a Detained Defendant Be Released at the First Hearing?

Yes. Release at the first hearing is legally possible, but it is not automatic.

Under Article 108 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court must consider whether continued detention remains necessary at each hearing.

Review of Detention Criminal Procedure Code · Articles 100 and 108

The court may continue detention, release the defendant or, where legally appropriate, apply judicial-control measures after assessing the statutory grounds and circumstances of the case.

A release application should address the actual detention grounds rather than merely ask the court for release.

Depending on the file, relevant issues may include:

The strength and current state of the evidence.
Whether evidence has already been collected.
Flight-risk allegations.
Alleged risk of interference with witnesses or evidence.
The defendant’s residence and other relevant personal circumstances.
Whether judicial control could adequately address the identified risk.

For detailed information, see Police Custody, Pre-Trial Detention and Judicial Control Objections in Antalya .

Does the Defendant Have to Attend the First Hearing?

A defendant should not assume that personal attendance is unnecessary simply because a defence lawyer will attend.

Under Article 193, the general rule is that a hearing is not conducted against an absent defendant except in circumstances recognised by law.

Article 196 also contains rules allowing a defendant whose questioning has already been completed to be excused from later hearings in certain circumstances.

Do not skip the hearing based on an informal assumption Whether personal attendance is required should be checked from the court’s summons, the defendant’s procedural status and any specific court order.

What If the Defendant Does Not Speak Turkish?

Language should be addressed before the defendant is expected to make an effective defence.

Article 202 provides interpreter assistance where the defendant cannot understand or express themselves sufficiently in Turkish within the statutory framework.

Interpreter Assistance Criminal Procedure Code · Article 202

Where the defendant does not know Turkish sufficiently to explain themselves, essential aspects of the prosecution and defence at the hearing are translated through an interpreter appointed in accordance with the procedural rules.

An interpreter is not a criminal defence lawyer Interpretation addresses language. Defence counsel addresses the accusation, evidence, procedural legality, detention and legal strategy.

Is a Defence Lawyer Mandatory at a High Criminal Court Hearing?

Mandatory defence counsel is not determined merely by the words “High Criminal Court”.

Under Article 150 of the Criminal Procedure Code, mandatory counsel is required in specified circumstances. One important category concerns offences whose statutory minimum sentence exceeds five years’ imprisonment.

Many offences tried before a High Criminal Court satisfy that threshold, but the exact charge must still be checked.

The court level and the mandatory-counsel test are related but legally distinct The applicable offence and statutory punishment determine whether Article 150 requires counsel.

For broader information about representation during Turkish criminal proceedings, see Criminal Defense in Turkey: Why Legal Representation Matters .

Can the High Criminal Court Give a Judgment at the First Hearing?

It is legally possible, but complex serious-crime cases often continue beyond the first hearing.

The first hearing may instead result in interim procedural decisions such as:

DETENTION Release or continuation of detention

The court may review whether detention remains necessary.

EVIDENCE Collection of additional material

Documents, records, digital material or other evidence may be requested.

WITNESSES Future witness hearings

Witnesses who have not yet been heard may be summoned for another hearing.

EXPERT REVIEW Additional technical examination

An expert or forensic report may be ordered where the evidence requires specialist assessment.

A defendant and family members should therefore not assume in advance that the first hearing will necessarily result in acquittal, conviction or release.

How Should a Foreign Defendant Prepare for the First Hearing in Antalya?

Preparation should reconstruct the entire procedural history before deciding how the defence should be presented.

1. Review the indictment Identify the alleged conduct, offence and legal provisions relied upon by the prosecution.
2. Review previous statements Police and prosecutor statements are compared with the proposed trial defence.
3. Map the evidence Physical, digital, documentary, forensic and witness evidence are reviewed together.
4. Identify evidentiary gaps Missing records, witnesses or expert analysis relevant to the defence are identified.
5. Review detention Where the defendant is detained, the factual and legal basis for continued detention is assessed.
6. Address language issues Interpreter requirements and the client’s understanding of the accusation are checked before the hearing.
7. Prepare the defence position The decision whether to give a detailed defence, limited defence or exercise the right to silence is considered from the file.
8. Plan hearing requests Evidence requests, witness issues, procedural objections and release submissions are prepared in advance.
Attorney Cennet Kesici Çetinbaş reviewing a High Criminal Court case before the first hearing in Antalya
Preparation for the first High Criminal Court hearing requires coordinated review of the indictment, evidence, previous statements, detention status, language rights and hearing strategy.
Attorney Cennet Kesici Çetinbaş, Antalya Bar Association
Author and Legal Review

Attorney Cennet Kesici Çetinbaş

Attorney Cennet Kesici Çetinbaş graduated from Akdeniz University Faculty of Law in 2014 and has been practising law since 2015. She is registered with the Antalya Bar Association under registration number 4696. Her practice includes criminal investigations, serious criminal proceedings and legal matters involving foreign nationals in Turkey.

Antalya Bar Association No. 4696 Criminal Defence High Criminal Court International Clients
Frequently Asked Questions

First High Criminal Court Hearing in Antalya

What happens at the first hearing in a High Criminal Court in Antalya?

The court generally verifies who is present, establishes the defendant’s identity and personal circumstances, explains the accusation, informs the defendant of procedural rights and proceeds to questioning if the defendant is ready. Evidence, witnesses, detention and other procedural issues may also be addressed depending on the case.

Can I be released at the first hearing?

Yes. A detained defendant can be released at the first hearing where the legal and factual circumstances justify release. The court may instead continue detention or apply judicial control where appropriate.

Will I be convicted at the first hearing?

Not necessarily. Some criminal cases can legally conclude at the first hearing, but serious and evidentially complex cases often require further hearings, witnesses, expert reports or additional evidence.

Do I have to answer every question about the alleged offence?

No. A defendant has the right not to make a statement concerning the alleged offence. The strategic decision whether and how to make a defence should be assessed from the individual case file.

Is the indictment read at the first hearing?

The statutory procedure requires the acts, evidence and legal characterisation forming the basis of the accusation to be explained to the defendant. The essential issue is that the defendant understands the charge before questioning begins.

Can witnesses be heard at the first hearing?

Yes. Witnesses may be heard if they have been summoned and the court is ready to receive their testimony, although witness examination may also take place at later hearings.

Can evidence be challenged at the first hearing?

Yes. Evidence may be discussed during the proceedings and the defence may raise objections concerning relevance, reliability or the legality of how evidence was obtained where appropriate.

Does a foreign defendant have the right to an interpreter?

Yes. Where a defendant cannot sufficiently understand or express themselves in Turkish, interpreter assistance is provided within the framework of Article 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Do I have to attend the first hearing personally?

A defendant should not assume that a lawyer’s attendance automatically removes the need to appear. Personal attendance depends on the procedural status of the defendant, the summons and the statutory rules governing absence from trial.

Can an English-speaking criminal lawyer prepare a foreign defendant for the first hearing in Antalya?

Yes. Legal preparation may include review of the indictment, evidence and previous statements, assessment of detention, identification of procedural issues and preparation of the defence and evidentiary requests before the hearing.

Legal Sources

Legal Framework Used in This Guide

Legal Information Notice: This page provides general information about the first hearing in High Criminal Court proceedings under Turkish law. It does not constitute legal advice for an individual criminal case. Hearing procedure, detention, attendance requirements, defence strategy, evidence and possible outcomes depend on the charge, case file, procedural history and current legislation applicable to the individual proceedings.
Criminal Defence in Antalya

Preparing for Your First High Criminal Court Hearing in Antalya?

Attorney Cennet Kesici Çetinbaş provides English-language criminal defence and legal assistance in Antalya for foreign nationals involved in serious criminal investigations and High Criminal Court proceedings under Turkish law.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *